No Description Available.

During the year 2002 the Ohio State School board revised its recommendations for teaching science in all twelve grades. Many scientists wanted evolution taught. For six months newspapers carried news stories about books and debates, letters to editors from all directions, interviews sith teachers and writers, and long editorials. The author records most of these and reflects upon all sides critically. He comments within and upon them. Ohio dug up Darwin. Rolwing holds his nose, not at the corpse, but over the reasons given for both burying him and for digging him up. Bad history, bad science, bad philosophy, bad theology, bad politics, bad pedagogy, and bad faith raised quite a bad stink.

During the year 2002 the Ohio State School board revised its recommendations for teaching science in all twelve grades. Many scientists wanted evolution taught. For six months newspapers carried news stories about books and debates, letters to editors from all directions, interviews sith teachers and writers, and long editorials. The author records most of these and reflects upon all sides critically. He comments within and upon them. Ohio dug up Darwin. Rolwing holds his nose, not at the corpse, but over the reasons given for both burying him and for digging him up. Bad history, bad science, bad philosophy, bad theology, bad politics, bad pedagogy, and bad faith raised quite a bad stink.

This second Mick-Rick book begins by posing ten questions to which the authors independently respond with short essays. This format contrasts with the debates of book one. (The Mick-Rick Debates: Controversies in Contemporary Christianity) The ten Questions touch on fundamental issues facing today’s Christians such as suffering, life after death, religious cosmology, moral principles and others. The intention of the questions is not to provide pat answers but, rather, to stimulate reflection on the nature and content of Christian Faith in the context of the modern world.

The second part of the book consists of two essays. In Before and After the Big Bang, Rick argues it is possible to live in both the worlds of materialism as represented by science and the immaterial world of religion. Religion or the sacred provides meaning for life; science or the profane provides for our material needs.

Mick holds the idea of traffic between the natural and supernatural destroys the foundations of modern knowledge. In his essay, On Our Own But not Alone, he suggests that to attain maturity we must also gain autonomy, neither of which survives in a world invaded by the supernatural.

The book concludes with a debate on the nature of Constructs that are key mental tools used in religious and philosophical discourse.

Similar to the first book, the interlocutors, Michael Maasdorp (Mick) and Richard Arthur DeRemee (Rick) conducted their conversations over the Internet on the Radical Faith web site (http://homepages.which.net/-radical.faith/index.htm).

Liberal Christian theology has challenged traditional beliefs about the Church and the meaning of the life of Jesus Christ. Decline in Church membership, especially in Western Europe, has been attributed to an out-of-date concept of Christian reality by the Church hierarchy. This is a series of debates between a liberal Christian thinker, member of an Anglican religious community, and a physician of conservative views raised in the traditions of the ELCA. The debates were conducted on the Radical Faith web site (http://homepages.which.net/-radical.faith/index.htm). The debates engage, in topical fashion, some fundamental issues highlighting the differences distinguishing traditional believers from those of the liberal movement. They uncover many hidden attitudes that shape belief and influence change in the modern church. Basically, the debates are odysseys of personal journeys of faith in the context of widely different circumstances. One debater (Mick) is a member of an Anglican religious community, The Society of the Sacred Mission. He was born, raised and educated in South Africa experiencing the raw realities of apartheid and the trials of poor South Africans. After careers as a businessman and parish priest he has devoted himself to writing on matters of faith and maintaining a web site concerning current problems in Christianity. The other debater is a physician (Rick), retired from the Mayo Clinic, who synthesizes his experience both as a medical counselor and life-long Lutheran (ELCA) into his current world view. The discussions are frank but civil bearing on the gaps between traditional and radical notions of Christianity. Often the debates swirl about questions of non-material versus strictly material realities that mirror the day to day doubts, hopes and aspirations of Christians in the 21st century.

This second Mick-Rick book begins by posing ten questions to which the authors independently respond with short essays. This format contrasts with the debates of book one. (The Mick-Rick Debates: Controversies in Contemporary Christianity) The ten Questions touch on fundamental issues facing today’s Christians such as suffering, life after death, religious cosmology, moral principles and others. The intention of the questions is not to provide pat answers but, rather, to stimulate reflection on the nature and content of Christian Faith in the context of the modern world.

The second part of the book consists of two essays. In Before and After the Big Bang, Rick argues it is possible to live in both the worlds of materialism as represented by science and the immaterial world of religion. Religion or the sacred provides meaning for life; science or the profane provides for our material needs.

Mick holds the idea of traffic between the natural and supernatural destroys the foundations of modern knowledge. In his essay, On Our Own But not Alone, he suggests that to attain maturity we must also gain autonomy, neither of which survives in a world invaded by the supernatural.

The book concludes with a debate on the nature of Constructs that are key mental tools used in religious and philosophical discourse.

Similar to the first book, the interlocutors, Michael Maasdorp (Mick) and Richard Arthur DeRemee (Rick) conducted their conversations over the Internet on the Radical Faith web site (http://homepages.which.net/-radical.faith/index.htm).

Liberal Christian theology has challenged traditional beliefs about the Church and the meaning of the life of Jesus Christ. Decline in Church membership, especially in Western Europe, has been attributed to an out-of-date concept of Christian reality by the Church hierarchy. This is a series of debates between a liberal Christian thinker, member of an Anglican religious community, and a physician of conservative views raised in the traditions of the ELCA. The debates were conducted on the Radical Faith web site (http://homepages.which.net/-radical.faith/index.htm). The debates engage, in topical fashion, some fundamental issues highlighting the differences distinguishing traditional believers from those of the liberal movement. They uncover many hidden attitudes that shape belief and influence change in the modern church. Basically, the debates are odysseys of personal journeys of faith in the context of widely different circumstances. One debater (Mick) is a member of an Anglican religious community, The Society of the Sacred Mission. He was born, raised and educated in South Africa experiencing the raw realities of apartheid and the trials of poor South Africans. After careers as a businessman and parish priest he has devoted himself to writing on matters of faith and maintaining a web site concerning current problems in Christianity. The other debater is a physician (Rick), retired from the Mayo Clinic, who synthesizes his experience both as a medical counselor and life-long Lutheran (ELCA) into his current world view. The discussions are frank but civil bearing on the gaps between traditional and radical notions of Christianity. Often the debates swirl about questions of non-material versus strictly material realities that mirror the day to day doubts, hopes and aspirations of Christians in the 21st century.

Herein this book is great works found within the highest power of thoughts shared from a young writer by the name of Borges C. Pasteur. In this book you will find so many things that point to the existences of God, through faith, facts, nature, scriptures, science history and thoughts that before was not heard of, until the making of this book came to be. The goal of these great texts is to give one the greater understandings of the world, space, time and the ordinance that God the Creator left for us to enjoy in the righteous manner and so much more, in which one can come to believe in the Creator of the heaven and the earth. Also you will find quotes from great people like Jesus Christ the LORD of lords, Albert Einstein, Sr. Isaac Newton, Noah who build the ark and what God shared with him, Dr. King, a wonderful person I know and so many more to broaden your mind, to find and to look beyond religion and see that God lives on. That the entire human race exists for this Greater purpose of God. But we must first live this life the here and now, before understanding beyond what we can see, that is eternity, to one day have it in come our grips by being worthy of it. We must first love the little things and understand them. So we can know what we are here for and have to fulfill before we can understand the greater things of God that would blow our minds, if we were to see them and know them now. Just for what you are going to read in this book it will bring a great amount of understanding to your mind. Things like, the purpose for the sand of the sea, what causes the ocean tides to divided, the reason we see the rainbow in the sky today, what science cannot fully explain but only found within the Holy bible, the meaning of the word Bible, the things our founding Fathers new about our great country. You will know some of these insights just from reading what God allowed me to find and explain in this book, it will bring you more and greater understanding and broaden your thoughts to think highly on a normal bases. You will love what comes to mind, so enjoy what I now understand, in which many of the brilliant mind of the past understood.

Herein this book is great works found within the highest power of thoughts shared from a young writer by the name of Borges C. Pasteur. In this book you will find so many things that point to the existences of God, through faith, facts, nature, scriptures, science history and thoughts that before was not heard of, until the making of this book came to be. The goal of these great texts is to give one the greater understandings of the world, space, time and the ordinance that God the Creator left for us to enjoy in the righteous manner and so much more, in which one can come to believe in the Creator of the heaven and the earth. Also you will find quotes from great people like Jesus Christ the LORD of lords, Albert Einstein, Sr. Isaac Newton, Noah who build the ark and what God shared with him, Dr. King, a wonderful person I know and so many more to broaden your mind, to find and to look beyond religion and see that God lives on. That the entire human race exists for this Greater purpose of God. But we must first live this life the here and now, before understanding beyond what we can see, that is eternity, to one day have it in come our grips by being worthy of it. We must first love the little things and understand them. So we can know what we are here for and have to fulfill before we can understand the greater things of God that would blow our minds, if we were to see them and know them now. Just for what you are going to read in this book it will bring a great amount of understanding to your mind. Things like, the purpose for the sand of the sea, what causes the ocean tides to divided, the reason we see the rainbow in the sky today, what science cannot fully explain but only found within the Holy bible, the meaning of the word Bible, the things our founding Fathers new about our great country. You will know some of these insights just from reading what God allowed me to find and explain in this book, it will bring you more and greater understanding and broaden your thoughts to think highly on a normal bases. You will love what comes to mind, so enjoy what I now understand, in which many of the brilliant mind of the past understood.

On visits to his bank, Mark becomes attracted to a recently hired teller. He works up the courage to invite her out for dinner and learns that it is not a good idea because of a long-standing difficulty between their fathers. He begins to ask questions of others in his Christian association who might help him understand why events from years past now impinge on his own life. His father is sorely displeased with the opening of old wounds and rebukes him sharply for his pursuit of “forbidden fruit.” The story—with overtones from the houses of Montague and Capulet—evolves from here.

On visits to his bank, Mark becomes attracted to a recently hired teller. He works up the courage to invite her out for dinner and learns that it is not a good idea because of a long-standing difficulty between their fathers. He begins to ask questions of others in his Christian association who might help him understand why events from years past now impinge on his own life. His father is sorely displeased with the opening of old wounds and rebukes him sharply for his pursuit of “forbidden fruit.” The story—with overtones from the houses of Montague and Capulet—evolves from here.

The great English philosopher and mathematician, A. N. Whitehead, once stated, “A philosopher of imposing stature doesn't think in a vacuum. Even his most abstract ideas are, to some extent, conditioned by what is or what is not known in the time when he lives.” Charles Darwin's idea of evolution by natural selection was no exception. The accepted tale of Darwin's voyage to discovery is that of an intrepid naturalist who used his great powers of scientific observation to deliver to the world nature's secret of speciation. However, a closer examination of naturalism, the intellectual movement that shaped Darwin's worldview, will lead us to a different conclusion. Naturalism, the idea that the material universe is all there ever was, all there is, and all there ever will be, is the only logical alternative to the theocentric universe proposed in the book of Genesis and other religious texts. Early Greek philosophers, Renaissance humanists, and Enlightenment philosophers proposed different forms of evolution as alternatives to a supernatural explanation of the existence and varieties of living things on earth. As the intellectual revolt against the Creation-Fall-Redemption ground-motive of Christianity gained strength in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, scientists were hard-pressed to explain the transmutation of species (evolution) apart from some supernatural elements. Naturalists used terms like “mind” or “force of will” as the mechanism of organic change that produced the bounty and variety observed in nature. By the time Charles Darwin set sail on the Beagle, he knew that supernatural interpretations to the study of both man and nature had become liabilities. Therefore, his observations of nature had to conform to the presuppositions of naturalism to be considered “scientific.” Charles Darwin may have been only a footnote in the history evolution except for his invention of a theory that seemed to provide his contemporaries with what they had been desperately searching for: a purely natural explanation for the origin of and variation within species, void of any references to the philosophy that spawned it. As Frederick Osborn states in the preface, this book is not a scientific treatise, nor is it an attempt to assassinate the characters of Charles Darwin or any of his followers. What this book does is trace the lines of philosophical reasoning that shaped Darwin's world, influenced his interpretations of nature, and then in the guise of pure science reshaped the modern secular worldview. In the final chapter of this book, Frederick offers the biblical view of man and nature and compares it with the Darwinian view.

No Description Available.

No Description Available.

No Description Available.